 |
General Discussion | Entrar | Regístrate GRATIS |
|
General Discussion | Entrar | Regístrate GRATIS |
| Djack7-12 - 2024-05-31 Ya, ok. Or was I was using the old 'no guns/no voting' trope, because everyone knows the no guns/no voting trope for felons? Yes, the laws vary wildly. I agree |
 58 |
| Djack7-12 - 2024-05-31 You do know what a trope is... don't you? |
58 |
supereddie - 2024-05-31Funny thing is in order to make this a federal crime Bragg can't try the case. It would have to be moved to a federal court. And the federal court would say there is no crime here and throw it out. Silly Silly djack lol |
67 H |
| DareToBe - 2024-05-31 But you said Trump would be found not guilty and it would be the best thing for him TM. Seems you're just trying to be right when you were just wrong lol |
55 H |
| DareToBe - 2024-05-31 So much for your, "Trump will never be convicted in any court or ever found guilty of a crime", hey TM? According to you he has right on his side. How's it feel TM? You were wrong again lol |
55 H |
| Davidpeterson21 - 2024-05-31 A total disgrace for America today we're turning into a third world banana Republic and anybody who supports this is anti-American |
53 |
| Damage-Control_ - 2024-05-31 Djack7-12 - 1 hour agoYa, ok. Or was I was using the old 'no guns/no voting' trope, because everyone knows the no guns/no voting trope for felons? Yes, the laws vary wildly. I agree  |
|
| Djack7-12 - 2024-05-31 Explain, daviepoo. What Constitutional rights did Trump have vyolated? Wasn't any due process rights. What was it? 1st amendment?  |
58 |
| Djack7-12 - 2024-05-31 Or was it his 2nd amendment right, because he couldn't bring a gun into court? I wouldn't put it past Trump to try to argue something like that, in order to cause delay. What right of his was infringed upon, daviepoo? |
58 |
| Djack7-12 - 2024-05-31 There's no question it was a fair trial.l, daviepoo. Trump and his lawyers were granted everything they were entitled to by law. Everything was done by the rules. It was a fair trial, and Trump got convicted. If you're going to claim corruption, you need to present evidence of corruption. Unsupported rere claims aren't valid in reality. |
58 |
